A biology textbook will tell you. 191Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡv4Jghm0p4S
People with biology degrees will tell you.
Even leading figures in abortion clinics themselves have admitted it. 191Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡIA3TrYvaKQ
Life begins at conception.
191Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡc5s3sB8cRL
The biology is extremely straight forward. I could go into fertilisation, zygotes, etc (read here for the full description) but it's not even necessary, we can simplify it much more.191Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡIQH2wIxAPA
Is it possible for something to
- be alive (organic and growing)
- have unique human DNA
- have human parents
- be the result of human procreation
- be in a human life stage (meaning eventually it will become a child, teenager, then adult)
and yet not be a human? No. It's absurd to say something can check all of these boxes and yet be something other than a human.
All of these facts are true from the moment of conception. As soon as fertilisation occurs, you have unique DNA that is different from the mother's DNA, so you cannot argue that it's “just a part of her body”, and this DNA will already now determine the child's future appearance and genes.191Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡqqXy04BDxL
There's no other logical beginning of life.
If human life starts when you develop a heartbeat, that means a person having a heart attack is no longer a human.
If human life starts when you begin thinking, then people aren't human when they're asleep.
If human life starts when you can survive independently from other humans... then human life starts after several years, because babies and toddlers cannot survive without their parents either. And disabled and elderly people wouldn't be humans either.
All this aside, these claims are not scientific. You can't say “well I think human life starts when...” we can't make up philosophical definitions of when life starts. It has to be biological. And the biology is clear on the subject.
ns18.119.1.164da2
and then Add to home screen.